tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294505416127496842.post6553238036501801905..comments2024-03-25T14:09:59.347-05:00Comments on Augoeides: Sheldrake Versus ShermerScott Stenwickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12389664381513219613noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294505416127496842.post-53553219830534189972015-05-12T14:18:58.392-05:002015-05-12T14:18:58.392-05:00Considering the implications of the psi mediated e...Considering the implications of the psi mediated experimenter effects noted in some psi studies, they're quite the opposite of something to be appreciated... their pushing of their agenda(and they use lies and fraud themselves REALLY quickly) basically an attack on me obtaining anything that would make my lie worth living(I literally don't care about 'mundane' success my only real motivation in life is to advance this field towards it's true potential). Then again, so is the way you approach this blog, you're just not a lying a fraud about it like they are.SeekInfinity-ICTXhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07848468029761608090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294505416127496842.post-69247054792173735382015-05-07T11:52:40.494-05:002015-05-07T11:52:40.494-05:00Hence the capital-S in Skeptic up there at the top...Hence the capital-S in Skeptic up there at the top. I am completely fine with actual skepticism, and totally down on the capital-S approach which is basically debunking with an agenda. I appreciate it when they take down some of the worst frauds, but other than that I would rather just see the evidence evaluated objectively.Scott Stenwickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12389664381513219613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294505416127496842.post-63431027407904247102015-05-07T07:16:04.594-05:002015-05-07T07:16:04.594-05:00Sorry man, I'm behind on my blog reading, sinc...Sorry man, I'm behind on my blog reading, since my eye has been busted out. <br /><br />I do like Sheldrake, but I've found him to be inconsistent a times. As for the other fellow, skepticism is just fine, as long as you don't take money from pharmaceutical interests to make false allegations about alternative practitioners or disseminate untruth and hate. <br /><br />Although I will note that traditionally skepticism meant you were SKEPTICAL of things, not that you go out of your way to support and defend the mainstream while attacking people who question the established world view, who imo are the actual "skeptics."Nerdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04393819034606674001noreply@blogger.com