tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294505416127496842.post7439421391744056855..comments2024-03-25T14:09:59.347-05:00Comments on Augoeides: Of Science and MagickScott Stenwickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12389664381513219613noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294505416127496842.post-74500813296798930192012-02-08T15:47:49.153-06:002012-02-08T15:47:49.153-06:00In my experience it's more of a both/and than ...In my experience it's more of a both/and than an either/or. Many of the effects of magick are psychological, but I also have been able to measure probability shifts that go well beyond chance related to my practical magical work.Scott Stenwickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12389664381513219613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294505416127496842.post-27298455481452907662012-02-08T05:53:31.702-06:002012-02-08T05:53:31.702-06:00I'm curious, do you think the magick is an dir...I'm curious, do you think the magick is an direct external manifestation of the adept's will, in the sense that the adept can actually affect their physical environment with their will?<br /><br />My preliminary view is that a large part of the great work could be explained in purely psychological terms, if one has to describe it scientifically.<br /><br />But so-called "low" magic that refers to pure material impact from will, I wonder if this really is an effect that takes place outside the magician's head and if in any way in this case would be measurable in some way?qwertyuiophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03882368038567231246noreply@blogger.com