When people ask employers for religious exemptions, they usually are conservative Christians looking to impose their views on others. Think pharmacists refusing to fill birth control prescriptions because birth control medication "causes abortions" - which, to be clear, it absolutely does not. This one, though, goes in a completely different direction. A Kentucky man who describes himself as a humanist has successfully argued for a religious exemption from using AI tools at work. He claims that outsourcing his thinking to AI violates his deeply held humanist beliefs.
David Durman, a research administrator at the University of Kentucky (UK), has successfully argued that using AI violates his beliefs as a humanist and has received Title VII religious accommodation from university officials not to use the technology. According to the Religion News Service (RNS), Durman believes in "the human part of life," which includes making his own decisions. However, he says that when the UK asked its employees to use AI, he felt that doing so would mean outsourcing his thinking to tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, thus violating his deeply held beliefs.
“The process and work involved in thinking through situations, through my work, through my ethics, through the way I handle other people, is a key component in being able to develop myself as a moral person,” Durman told RNS in an interview. “And offloading that labor, regardless of whether it’s taxing or not, is undercutting my ability to be a moral actor.” Because of this, the research administrator was granted a Title VII exemption under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. While humanism is often a non-religious philosophy or a worldview, federal courts have ruled that it qualifies as a religion.
The American Humanist Association (AHA) assisted Durman with his request for the accommodation. “This is the first of its kind at the AHA and for humanism generally to exempt those who see AI use as flying in the face of their freedom of conscience,” AHA staff attorney Alexandria Huiskens said to RNS. She also added, “For us, humanism is a comprehensive way of life. It’s built on inherent worth and dignity, and everyone should have room to exercise this comprehensive way of life at work the same way Christians do, or Muslims do.”
I don't know that I would call it a religious belief, but I do think it's problematic when companies develop policies forcing their employees to use AI tools. It seems to me that you can either do your work or you can't, and if you can get it done without AI you should be allowed to do so. Many studies have shown that using AI looks like it saves time at first, but the amount of back-end checking and verifying that it requires can take as much time as just solving the problem in the first place.
I'm happy to see a religious exemption for somebody other than a Christian upheld by the courts. If we are going to have religious freedom in this country, we need to make sure that the majority religion is not granted special privileges under the law. It shows that the rights of religious minorities nave not been completely stripped away.






